Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82QF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82QF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 19:36
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 64.8
1-Core 167
2-Core 328
97% 187 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 806
92% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.40.34.03
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 35.3
15% 27 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 27.2
19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znt512g LS KIOXIA 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0106ANLS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 962 363 417 414 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,775
Write 1,456
Mixed 1,203
SusWrite 654
284% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 54.5
182% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 687
469% 588 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 192%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 41.1
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 28.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82QF Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82QF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback