Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 255 3,508 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 51 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 27.3 25% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 30.4 8-Core 25 4% 27.7 Pts	64-Core 34.3 2% 34.3 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 7 Parallax 4.5 3% 5.13 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320413AS 320GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 251GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 40 25 22 46 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 62 Write 72.8 Mixed 33 SusWrite 38 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1870ED48E8F1066 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 None RMR1870ED48E8F1066 8GB 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.5 6% 2.23 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples	10x
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 820AMDBench 50%, 1,512 samples	6x

RAM
CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBCorsairBench 30%, 22 samples	6x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	3x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	3x