Today's hottest deals

Asus ProArt Studiobook W7600Z3A_W7600Z3A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ProArt Studiobook W7600Z3A_W7600Z3A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK W7600Z3A
Memory55 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 25 '23 at 14:58
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 74.9
1-Core 179
2-Core 348
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,079
104% 857 Pts
64-Core 1,946
120% 1,946 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 11B3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 125
Parallax 30.9
21% 60.9 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 22.6
23% 29 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX A3000 12GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1815 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 131
Parallax 122
96% 123 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 91.7
Splatting 99.8
84% 103 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
734GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,253
Write 2,062
Mixed 2,018
471% 2,111 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 81.6
263% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 743
534% 704 MB/s
Poor: 187% Great: 464%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88MEBSA092N 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 61.9
MC Write 61
MC Mixed 59.3
174% 60.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 28.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 155%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt Studiobook W7600Z3A_W7600Z3A Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Asus ProArt Studiobook W7600Z3A_W7600Z3A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback