Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory12.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJan 24 '23 at 21:21
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 128
54% 90 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 184
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 5.7
4% 6.9 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.4
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 191 168 142 57 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 375
Write 215
Mixed 183
SusWrite 133
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 20
80% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 169
148% 224 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 83%
Samsung SSD 860 1TB
129GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 39 40 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 40.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 39.3
54% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 12.4
871% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 22.5
DQ Mixed 17.3
1,408% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 0973 V2D4SF16GB1G81G82400 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback