Fujitsu ESPRIMO E710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '23 at 19:19
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 316
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 12.8
12% 13.8 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 15.4
11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 33 54 67 85 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 85.2
Write 90.9
Mixed 53
SusWrite 65.1
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 87%
WDC WD50 00AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
18GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 77 79 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
Read 79.2
Write 81
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 77.8
100% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E710 Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback