HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 22:37
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 261
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 696
76% 605 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.6% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 83.7
76% 89.2 fps
MRender 90.6
Gravity 85.9
Splatting 71.3
66% 82.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 56 144 145 56 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,311
Write 897
Mixed 807
SusWrite 177
177% 798 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 73.2
256% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 221
259% 434 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 167%
Great: 203%
Seagate Expansion SW 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1801
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 182 185 197 191 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 94%
H/W DISK 1 1TB
837GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 77 79 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 79
SusWrite 77.9
129% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.6
186% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 59%
WD easystore 2648 5TB
135GB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 99 96 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 107
Write 88.8
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 97.7
122% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.8
250% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
H/W DISK 2 4TB
318GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 70.2
Write 73.7
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 1.1
63% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 59%
H/W DISK 3 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 1.7 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 92.4
Write 84.9
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 1.1
73% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 56%
H/W DISK 4 2TB
258GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 76 79 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 165
Write 161
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 77.2
155% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 16.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback