HP 700-202eg

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 700-202eg  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131205
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '17 at 05:31
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 233
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 587
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Device(1B0A 90D2) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.201.1001.1004
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 32.4
25% 30.7 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 35.2
25% 29.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 184
Mixed 167
139% 185 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.31
106% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1.5TB
914GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 17.7
Mixed 21.4
27% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.19
18% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 42%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
793GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 98.1
Write 103
Mixed 98.5
130% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.29
91% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 70%
SAMSUNG HN-M750MBB 750GB
224GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 76.7
Write 74
Mixed 79.1
99% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.28
64% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-202eg Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 700-202eg

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback