HP EliteDesk 705 G3 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteDesk 705 G3 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8265
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '23 at 08:40
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A10-8770 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 556 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 47.3 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 126 40% 71.5 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 173 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IND-S325S/256G 256GB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0818A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 7.2 2.8 35 48 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 432 Write 335 Mixed 316 SusWrite 30 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 18.5 86% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 90.4 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 38.7 60% 109 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 66GB free Firmware: PB3OC64G SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 41 41 41 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 51.8 Write 40.3 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 40.6 29% 39 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 252GB free, PID 0214 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 52.7 Write 21.1 Mixed 18 SusWrite 25.8 35% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.6 25% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 18%
FUJITSU MJA2320BH G2 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 45GB free, PID 70f5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.8% Very poor	Read 52.8 Write 21.2 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 17.6 32% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.5 21% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 12%
WD Elements 2620 2TB 1,768 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3GB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.68% Terrible	Read 16.9 Write 19.4 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 17.9 22% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 19% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 6.68% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown - [0x9B85] BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 4x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.6% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 13.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 9.4 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 MT Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 MT

CPU
PRO A10-8770 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6GAMDBench 42%, 556 samples	37x
PRO A12-8870 R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8GAMDBench 44%, 106 samples	10x
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 Quad-CoreAMDBench 72%, 304 samples	9x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	36x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x

SSD
MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 77%, 2,468 samples	10x
SD8SB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,064 samples	7x
KingFast 256GBBench 72%, 7,147 samples	3x

RAM
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	7x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	5x
HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 66%, 5,828 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16