QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 19:24
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 85.7
1-Core 192
2-Core 382
115% 220 Pts
4-Core 756
8-Core 1,413
130% 1,084 Pts
64-Core 1987
123% 1987 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 122
Parallax 156
85% 128 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 118
Splatting 81.1
80% 99.3 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria G2 SSD 1TB
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1161 664 680 701 701 698 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,153
Write 1,641
Mixed 1,301
SusWrite 768
275% 1,216 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 48.8
156% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,603
DQ Write 1462
DQ Mixed 1,407
1,090% 1,491 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 209%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 35.3
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 102%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback