Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 455 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 455 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 836E
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 21:55
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR)
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 34.9
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 95.3
34% 61 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 131
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 836E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.01
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 8.4
5% 6.87 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.2
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AV0A2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 77 104 103 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 81.7
Write 93.4
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 99.9
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 69%
PNY USB 3.2.1 FD 64GB
29GB free, PID 1008
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 207
Write 12
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 13.7
53% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 455 G5 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 455 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback