Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 16:16
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 253
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 845
82% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,205
75% 1,205 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$535
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
216% Outstanding
Lighting 323
Reflection 278
Parallax 338
263% 313 fps
MRender 356
Gravity 259
Splatting 184
209% 266 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 216%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,099
Write 9,541
Mixed 8,601
1,962% 8,747 MB/s
4K Read 525
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 289
1,290% 350 MB/s
DQ Read 1299
DQ Write 917
DQ Mixed 990
771% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$139
875GB free
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2396 2403 2404 2398 2177 2405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 2,530
Write 2,464
Mixed 2,292
SusWrite 2364
544% 2,413 MB/s
4K Read 74.7
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 102
333% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 986
746% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 395%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 56.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 43.9
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 42.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $887
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback