Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory1.1 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '17 at 19:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 87
2-Core 143
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 207
29% 212 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 29.1
28% 32 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 30.7
26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 237
Write 108
Mixed 136
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 10.4
67% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 67
DQ Mixed 8.46
16% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS7250S 500GB
58GB free
Firmware: K2AOAV0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 40.3
Mixed 42.5
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.23
70% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 12
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback