HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory110.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220120
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 14:06
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6136
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 880
78% 660 Pts
64-Core 3,240
200% 3,240 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
HP(103C 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.18 WHQL
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.2% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 67.6
33% 54.8 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 42.4
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,984
Write 1934
Mixed 1,388
394% 1,769 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 50.3
168% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 323
301% 481 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 284%
ST4000NM0165 4TB
7TB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 299 293 297 305 293 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.8% Average
Read 353
Write 325
Mixed 113
SusWrite 297
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 2.7
28% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 2.8
6% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 63%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TB
548GB free
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1842 1763 1361 1046 1047 1065 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,978
Write 1813
Mixed 1,328
SusWrite 1,354
363% 1,618 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 52.6
174% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 447
366% 538 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 242%
Great: 321%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,991
Write 1,967
Mixed 1413
399% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 54.8
177% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 451
370% 545 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 321%
Seagate ST4000NM0035-1V4107 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: DA02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67% Good
Read 189
Write 46.2
Mixed 57
SusWrite 44.3
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67%
Great: 115%
Toshiba MG03ACA400 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FL3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 158 160 162 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 130
Write 141
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 160
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB2-CTD 4x31.8GB
4 of 24 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57% Above average
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 17.1
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback