Medion Akoya E4020 E MD8306/2474

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion Akoya E4020 E MD8306/2474 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION D3F3-EM2
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160321
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '22 at 10:04
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G 1,794 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	20.4% Poor	Memory 28.9 1-Core 47.5 2-Core 51.5 26% 42.6 Pts	4-Core 69.7 8-Core 70.7 9% 70.2 Pts	64-Core 83.9 5% 83.9 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Elitegroup(1019 9BCD) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.75% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 7.6 Parallax 15.4 7% 10.4 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 8 7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.75% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 805GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 54 52 42 47 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 147 Write 131 Mixed 79.9 SusWrite 42.6 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 109%
TrekStor DS maxi g.u 640GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 170GB free, PID 001b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 35 34 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 30.7 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 34.2 41% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.2 89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 22%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 53.4 Write 21.4 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 17.8 33% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 32% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 75%
Seagate Desktop 1TB 4,684 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 171GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 51.3 Write 21.5 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 17.3 32% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.6 24% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5674EB0-YK0 2x2GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 261 15% 261 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion Akoya E4020 E MD8306/2474

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)