Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 05:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 493
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.27
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 18.6
16% 18.4 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 15.8
16% 20 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 300 336 378 401 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 431
Write 400
Mixed 354
SusWrite 344
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 30.9
90% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 245
192% 266 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965640-007.C00G 1x31GB
1 of 8 slots used
31GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback