Acer Veriton M4618G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M4618G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4618G
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110416
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '22 at 22:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 22,247,790 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 165
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 273
35% 265 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 458 394 323 347 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 436
Mixed 432
SusWrite 381
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 54.6
179% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 115%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
734GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 192
Write 42.4
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 42.7
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 109%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
135GB free
Firmware: JA2OA590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 60
Write 59.7
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 63.4
37% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AE34G1339U2 AE34G1339U2 Kingston 9905584-020.A00LF Kingston 9905584-020.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M4618G Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4618G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback