Asus Pro WS 565-ACE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS 565-ACE  (all builds)
Memory121.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 04:33
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 149
48% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 558
52% 431 Pts
64-Core 1,790
111% 1,790 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 50%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZQLB1T9HAJR-00007 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDA5502Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 755 842 843 823 931 1000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,235
Write 1,785
Mixed 742
SusWrite 866
261% 1,157 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 38.6
136% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 1,502
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 1,167
881% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 198%
Great: 373%
Samsung MZQLB1T9HAJR-00007 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EDA5502Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1026 1100 958 958 863 873 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,280
Write 1,203
Mixed 871
SusWrite 963
242% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 39.1
140% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,770
DQ Write 1,195
DQ Mixed 1418
1,076% 1,461 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 219%
Great: 373%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A4G43AB1-CWE 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 26.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback