Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 18:55
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 212
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 613
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 155
Parallax 155
128% 156 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 137
Splatting 119
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 787
Write 517
Mixed 547
137% 617 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 40.1
132% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 529
DQ Mixed 314
264% 374 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 157%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
864GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 409 442 477 479 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 408
Mixed 382
SusWrite 439
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 54.1
176% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 103 115 120 111 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 161
Write 164
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 114
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 108%
WDC WD50 01FZWX-00ZHUA0 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 39.9
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 14.2
41% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
128% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 96%
WDC WD50 01FZWX-00ZHUA0 5TB
168GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 40.2
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 14.2
40% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 96%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 54.1
Write 36.2
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 14.2
41% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback