Alienware M17xR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware M17xR4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M17xR4
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '22 at 17:35
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 161
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 411
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680M
Dell(1028 0551) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 23.4
11% 21.1 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 22.3
21% 25.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 97 108 100 117 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 402
Write 326
Mixed 220
SusWrite 109
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 12.6
53% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 88.5
DQ Mixed 43.3
48% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 56%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
453GB free
Firmware: 0005DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 94 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 106
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 100
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NS-DI 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M17xR4 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M17xR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback