Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 83.5 2-Core 156 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 362 39% 310 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5670 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Apple(106B 00D2) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 25.20.14003.1010 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.44% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 5.1 4% 5.73 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.9 4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 6,980 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 139 95 64 63 62 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 148 Write 87 Mixed 117 SusWrite 92.4 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 13.5 48% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 16.6 DQ Mixed 17.5 14% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.1% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	20x
Mobility Radeon HD 5850AMDBench 7%, 1,228 samples	16x
HD 5750AMDBench 8%, 12,403 samples	6x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $161

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16