HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 08:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 174
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 309
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 103
Parallax 105
90% 106 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 100
Splatting 90.8
85% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lunatic Elite SSD 256 GB 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 331 358 422 427 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 386
Write 398
Mixed 342
SusWrite 325
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 36.1
125% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 193
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-041.A00LF 9905474-060.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 12.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2 MT Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback