Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS3  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateNov 09 '17 at 07:00
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 175
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 328
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 17
Parallax 20.2
19% 20.1 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 215
Write 122
Mixed 117
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 9.93
62% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 9.59
12% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 110%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
332GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 72.2
Write 80.2
Mixed 28.2
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.28
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
56GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 151
Mixed 106
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.28
95% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS3 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback