Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17L2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF76 11UD
MotherboardMSI MS-17L2  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220113
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 22:01
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 65.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 265
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 778
84% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,025
63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12EB) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2686
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 16.2
16% 16.9 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 11.3
13% 16.7 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1 512GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1036 537 296 290 294 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,323
Write 1,132
Mixed 1,120
SusWrite 457
226% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 78.3
293% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 863
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 814
630% 859 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 210%
Great: 213%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 148 146 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79% Very good
Read 128
Write 137
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 147
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 79%
Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 151 149 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 157
Write 140
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 150
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 88%
Great: 127%
ST2000VM 003-1CT164 2TB
961GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 124 123 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 113
Write 153
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 120
154% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 46%
PNY CS90 0 500GB SSD
466GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 124 123 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
142% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 238
Mixed 211
SusWrite 120
267% 200 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 17.2
1,519% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 18.9
1,816% 23.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 15.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17L2 Builds (Compare 2,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback