PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP43-S3L (all builds) |
Memory | 3 GB free of 4.5 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20080815 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Nov 07 '17 at 12:51 |
Run Duration | 206 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E7400-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 1896 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.0
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.1%
Above average
|
||||
silicon -power 8GB
7GB free, PID 1f23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.83%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 512, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 10x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 7x |
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 9x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 5x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $117 |