Dell Latitude E6430

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6430  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0H3MT5
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 00:00
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3380M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Memory 22
1-Core 13.6
2-Core 24.7
13% 20.1 Pts
4-Core 27.9
8-Core 24.3
4% 26.1 Pts
64-Core 12.5
1% 12.5 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 300 332 329 314 330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 311
Write 278
Mixed 323
SusWrite 304
69% 304 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 11.8
48% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 93.6
DQ Write 58.9
DQ Mixed 66.1
52% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 100%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7.6 9 9 7 9.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 104
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 8.7
26% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.94% Terrible
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 1 GB/s
Latency 306
13% 306 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6430 Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6430

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback