Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 755 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 56.6 1-Core 74 2-Core 148 52% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 564 51% 428 Pts	64-Core 1,912 118% 1,912 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 71%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM05H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 440 Write 197 Mixed 218 62% 285 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 20.3 78% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 62.6 DQ Mixed 103 89% 137 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40BB0-CPB 2x31.5GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 8 slots used 63GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 11.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v31stBench 68%, 827 samples	4x
Xeon E5-2683 v4IntelBench 68%, 398 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
SA2000M8250G 250GBKingstonBench 171%, 42,173 samples	2x
WDS100T1XHE-00AFY0 1TBBench 407%, 4,117 samples	2x

RAM
M393A4K40BB1-CRC 8x31.9GBSamsungBench 115%, 118 samples	2x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GBHynixBench 112%, 348 samples	2x
M393A1G40EB1-CRC 8x8GBSamsungBench 113%, 66 samples	2x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42