Today's hottest deals

CCL Customised Desk PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemCCL Customised Desk PC  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B550M AORUS ELITE
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 14:32
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$220
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 181
2-Core 357
113% 211 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,368
122% 1,031 Pts
64-Core 2,316
143% 2,316 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 112%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 170
Parallax 160
143% 168 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 130
Splatting 114
114% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDS100T1XHE-00AF 1TB
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6149
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2147 2801 2100 1584 2132 1935 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2273
Write 3,340
Mixed 2,176
SusWrite 2,116
560% 2,476 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.4
198% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 748
556% 738 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 314%
Great: 341%
Amd-raid Array 2 959GB
702GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 549 680 611 680 649 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 256
Write 169
Mixed 166
SusWrite 638
70% 307 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 12.2
50% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 21.4
18% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 268%
Amd-raid WDC WD1002FBYS-0 1TB
758GB free
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 103 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 98.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 102
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
145% Outstanding
MC Read 82.7
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 39.8
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 37.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 145%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback