Today's hottest deals

Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10.5GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.5 GB free of 10.4922 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 12:38
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel CC150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 151
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 355
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T10
Nvidia(10DE 1370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 3150 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 130
Parallax 162
118% 146 fps
MRender 158
Gravity 143
Splatting 127
115% 143 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 114%
Great: 117%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
48GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 24 23 23 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 425
Write 287
Mixed 424
SusWrite 24.2
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 15.1
49% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 241
201% 291 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 92%
Xensrc PVDISK 91GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 40 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 561
Write 344
Mixed 385
SusWrite 40.2
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 20.3
62% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 295
227% 309 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 66%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 52GB
48GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 534
Write 314
Mixed 356
SusWrite 24.1
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 12.5
42% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 266
208% 285 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 74%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 53GB
48GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 24 23 24 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.4% Average
Read 499
Write 302
Mixed 354
SusWrite 24.3
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 13.1
34% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 263
207% 284 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x10GB
1 of 1 slots used
10GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 17.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 221%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback