Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 04:05
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 273
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 806
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,005
62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.3% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 138
Parallax 181
96% 146 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 133
Splatting 92.5
91% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SE20G-1T 1TB
460GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1244 683 683 796 873 747 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 598
Write 2,415
Mixed 571
SusWrite 838
253% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 60.8
207% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 1,112
814% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 186%
Great: 273%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
551GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1200 101 105 102 102 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,514
Write 1,326
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 286
231% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 68.4
239% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 465
425% 643 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 184%
Great: 255%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 168 167 160 163 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
41% Average
Read 240
Write 227
Mixed 150
SusWrite 164
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 1.2
79% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 1.7
2% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE601 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: LHGNX92C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 229
Write 41.1
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 45.6
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 128%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
471GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 182 183 182 186 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 57.5
Write 106
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 184
69% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
367% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 110%
TONPHA USB 2.0 Classic 16GB
14GB free, PID 0720
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.6 6.4 5.1 7.6 7.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 101
Write 3.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 6
21% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Mixed 0
44% 4 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.1% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 28.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 26.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback