Lenovo 80V4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80V4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 17:34
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 141
59% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 231
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 39F4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 6.4
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
64GB free (System drive), PID 6388
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 128 140 142 136 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 270
Write 261
Mixed 236
SusWrite 145
303% 228 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 8.8
771% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 9.8
DQ Write 20.8
DQ Mixed 13.6
1,206% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C19 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.2
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80V4 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80V4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback