Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A7
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Memory 27.2
1-Core 7.9
2-Core 23
14% 19.4 Pts
4-Core 28.3
8-Core 22.4
4% 25.3 Pts
64-Core 24.4
2% 24.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX110
HP(103C 84A7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1278
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 0.3
6% 5.5 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 9.8
4% 3.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
611GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 81 76 54 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 39.6
Write 84.8
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 69.4
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.3
134% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.05% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 272
15% 272 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback