Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1799

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE72 7RE
MotherboardMSI MS-1799  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 10:42
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 123
53% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 281
27% 221 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1123
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 36.3
30% 37 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 25.6
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
299GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 362 367 355 344 363 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 325 333 244 339 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 352
Write 295
Mixed 310
SusWrite 317
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 35.1
107% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 202
179% 271 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 115%
WDC WDS 100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
398GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 189 195 213 196 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 297
Write 328
Mixed 256
SusWrite 198
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 17.5
64% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 87.2
83% 130 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 114%
WDC WDS 100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 190 199 143 196 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 186
Write 204
Mixed 224
SusWrite 180
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 22.7
71% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 96.2
80% 115 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 114%
USB3.1 NVME&SATA 1TB
242GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 518 554 502 433 235 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 564
Write 595
Mixed 569
SusWrite 457
746% 546 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 34.7
2,622% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 37.2
DQ Write 72.9
DQ Mixed 47.9
4,247% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 309%
Great: 309%
SDHC Card 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 5.5 7.7 8.1 6.9 7.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 58.1
Write 8.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 7.2
18% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
87% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1799 Builds (Compare 1,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1799

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback