Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-DS3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '22 at 02:32
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 186 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 231 35% 254 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.40 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.3 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 19.1 16% 18.9 fps	MRender 23.4 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 15.7 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 155 157 156 154 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 410 Write 422 Mixed 349 SusWrite 180 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 40.1 133% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-042.A00G 9905678-138.A00G 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.1% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 21.1 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 21.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	79x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	65x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	59x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16