Today's hottest deals

EVGA X299 DARK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics231% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA X299 DARK  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 21:14
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9800X-$769
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 883
82% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,287
80% 1,287 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
Nvidia(10DE 1618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
231% Outstanding
Lighting 339
Reflection 316
Parallax 357
276% 337 fps
MRender 393
Gravity 314
Splatting 206
238% 304 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 231%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$103
516GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 1026 1028 993 951 1046 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,027
Write 2,255
Mixed 1,830
SusWrite 1,116
407% 1,807 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 75.5
271% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 885
658% 876 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 271%
Great: 347%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: M0MU033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 480 389 371 372 372 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 461
Mixed 379
SusWrite 410
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 42.2
158% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 341
256% 341 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: M0MU033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 480 483 483 483 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 484
Mixed 381
SusWrite 482
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 42.2
158% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 337
254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 105%
Maxtor STM3320820AS 320GB
76GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 69 69 70 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 78.9
Write 32.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 69.2
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$75
508GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 103 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 103
74% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60%
Great: 65%
Maxtor 7H500F0 500GB-$50
304GB free
Firmware: HA431DN0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 57 55 56 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 57.4
Mixed 37
SusWrite 56.8
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0
131% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 38%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$33
221GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 108
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 105
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 26.1
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 9.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 DARK Builds (Compare 346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

Motherboard: EVGA X299 DARK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback