Today's hottest deals

Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7100GM2NR
Memory51.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210318
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 04:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6248R
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 62.6
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 182
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 678
61% 515 Pts
64-Core 2,728
169% 2,728 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$535
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
204% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 295
Parallax 372
236% 319 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 269
Splatting 197
216% 275 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 204%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1907 1899 1684 1668 1704 1698 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,306
Write 2,129
Mixed 2,070
SusWrite 1,760
465% 2,066 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 73.8
239% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 305
248% 343 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 291%
Great: 477%
Toshiba MG08ADA400N 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 225 227 225 227 227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 242
Write 108
Mixed 111
SusWrite 224
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.9
8% 3.97 MB/s
DQ Read 3
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 1.5
2% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 12 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback