Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 00:40
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 82.3
33% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 124
20% 140 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 27% Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.77 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer SA100 240GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 80 124 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 330
Write 314
Mixed 335
SusWrite 96.5
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 16.4
73% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 99.2
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 25.1
54% 106 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
204GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 114 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 120
Write 106
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 114
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 109%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
88GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 64.1
Mixed 42
SusWrite 54.5
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 7.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 1,087
4% 1,087 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $296
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback