ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-BD4
Memory	57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210519
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '22 at 20:50
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4 141 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 105 2-Core 173 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 636 62% 509 Pts	64-Core 810 50% 810 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB 12,228 User benchmarks, average bench 96% Asus(1043 886E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.3% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 102 Parallax 113 95% 111 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 110 Splatting 92.1 87% 108 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
VK000240GWEZB 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPG6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 183 186 185 185 183 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 430 Write 210 Mixed 209 SusWrite 182 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 22.9 93% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 165 141% 210 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 89%
VK000240GWEZB 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 57GB free Firmware: HPGB SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 213 217 213 187 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 441 Write 246 Mixed 209 SusWrite 204 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 24.1 93% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 188 151% 213 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 210 212 207 211 216 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 153 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 211 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 4x16GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 44.7 MC Write 47.4 MC Mixed 40.6 126% 44.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 19 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback