Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-R  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 01:20
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 178
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 286
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.4% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 65.4
55% 67.8 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 63.4
54% 65.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
242GB free
Firmware: SBFKP1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 370 412 243 247 327 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 227
Write 106
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 324
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 10.9
50% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 235
161% 188 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 320
Write 75.5
Mixed 59.1
32% 152 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 6.7
43% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 20.8
16% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
88GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 337 357 370 265 266 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 465
Write 372
Mixed 310
SusWrite 319
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 34.7
120% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 196
176% 265 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 103%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 250G 250GB
143GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 208 224 235 233 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 241
Write 232
Mixed 233
SusWrite 222
316% 232 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 22.6
1,777% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 35.1
DQ Mixed 27.3
2,208% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 172%
Great: 172%
LITEON C V8-CE128-11 SATA 128GB
12GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 241
Write 236
Mixed 235
306% 238 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 22.9
1,824% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 35.9
DQ Mixed 27.8
2,254% 29.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $308
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback