Today's hottest deals

Digma EVE 14 P416 ES4062EW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDigma EVE 14 P416 ES4062EW  (all builds)
MotherboardEii S116C REV02
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '22 at 19:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J3710
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14% Very poor
Memory 21
1-Core 12.9
2-Core 26.5
13% 20.1 Pts
4-Core 40.2
8-Core 44.5
6% 42.3 Pts
64-Core 47.2
3% 47.2 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Device(F000 02F3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 313
13% 313 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback