Today's hottest deals

Intel H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H55  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 130
51% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 201
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
AMD(1002 0B0E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 5.8
6% 6.73 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.8
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 240G 240GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP22274P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 207 157 199 211 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.1% Poor
Read 193
Write 171
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 193
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.7
5% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback