Acer Aspire 5630

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5630  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Grapevine
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '17 at 16:51
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7200-$52
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 45.6
31% 43 Pts
4-Core 42.7
8-Core 43.6
6% 43.2 Pts
64-Core 42.6
3% 42.6 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300
Acer(1025 0090) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7948
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.18% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.09
0% 0.24 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.18%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9120822A 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ALC Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 39
Write 38.8
Mixed 37.9
29% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.27
58% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.1
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5630 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback