Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '17 at 21:04
Run Duration	588 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 124 59% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 328 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD480HAGM-000DA 480GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM01W1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 622 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 132 (B1) Unknown 99 99 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 18304 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 60 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 123 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2313716770	54% Above average	Read 225 Write 222 Mixed 229 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 22.1 96% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 30.7 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 21.9 26% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 288 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 76 65 7505 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3580 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9144 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3694 (B5) Unknown 85 85 326210920 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 35 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 64 133144969239 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 2777 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3730	79.1% Very good	Read 133 Write 143 Mixed 80.9 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.53 4K Mixed 0.32 108% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 72%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 2.35 Mixed 0.6 5% 6.22 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.009 3% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.6% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 13.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 8.9 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	498x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	198x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	68x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	222x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $289

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16