Asus M5A78L-M LX

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A78L-M LX (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111130
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '22 at 13:19
Run Duration	250 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4100-$110 32,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 82.7 1-Core 22.5 2-Core 93.3 43% 66.2 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 141 17% 133 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36F8) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4.4 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.3 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 75 73 71 83 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.4% Poor	Read 170 Write 144 Mixed 144 SusWrite 72.3 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 8.3 37% 9.87 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$144 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1.5TB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 73 84 78 78 90 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.4% Poor	Read 160 Write 116 Mixed 141 SusWrite 80.6 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 6.3 30% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 128%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZBX-75A 2TB 962 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 147GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 72 85 78 77 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 122 Write 118 Mixed 70 SusWrite 80.4 72% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.1 550% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 135%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 75 71 71 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 123 Write 104 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 71.8 67% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 855GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 93 105 101 96 114 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 136 Write 114 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 101 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 84%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 147GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.1 9.2 8.9 8.8 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 52.9 Write 17.5 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 9.2 26% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.5 29% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB 2,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 802GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.2 9.8 9.4 8.9 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 51 Write 19.5 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 9.4 24% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.5 37% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 54%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 338GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 10 9.7 9.3 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	6.91% Terrible	Read 21.7 Write 21.6 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 9.8 24% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.9 90% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.91% Great: 173%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 10.8 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A78L-M LX Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX - $200

CPU
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	50x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	47x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	27x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	149x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	39x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $338

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $252	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16