Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 33.9 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 129 42% 78.2 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 159 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 75%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron M600 256GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 140 140 126 132 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.9% Below average	Read 193 Write 172 Mixed 146 SusWrite 140 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 6.4 24% 8.63 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 122 109% 166 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 20GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.1 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	3x

GPU
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	3x

SSD
Blue 3D 500GBWD $67Bench 97%, 43,442 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x

RAM
F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 01BA 4GBH1X04E99927-15 04CD F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 01BA 4GBH1X04E99927-15 16GBUnknownBench 46%, 7 samples	3x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $67

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16