Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79TO
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateSep 24 '22 at 09:51
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 166
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 520
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 6.6
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 7
6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 240 239 235 234 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 452
Write 260
Mixed 228
SusWrite 238
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 26.2
86% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 163
125% 174 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
50GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 536 537 549 558 559 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 726
Write 564
Mixed 593
SusWrite 544
136% 607 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 33.3
114% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 433
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 182
158% 244 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 110%
Great: 346%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
753GB free
Firmware: A560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 91 89 91 94 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 84
Write 78.8
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 88.7
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
15GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 60 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 41.7
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 59.7
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4A4D313333334B4C482D38472020202020 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback