Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 22:26
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 121
58% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 270
31% 244 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gigabyte(1458 3559) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 49.4
Parallax 45.1
29% 43.3 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 45.2
Splatting 33.6
31% 39 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHFS37A480G 480GB
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 184 186 192 194 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 312
Write 204
Mixed 238
SusWrite 185
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 17.6
58% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 90.1
77% 115 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 110 108 112 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 105
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 108
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 68%
Generic External 128GB
70GB free, PID 3920
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 52.2
Write 27.3
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 28.2
42% 34 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 7
362% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback