Samsung 930QDB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 930QDB  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP930QDB-KD3US
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220622
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '22 at 19:27
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 165
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 354
39% 307 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Sanyo(144D C1A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.29% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 13.9
10% 14.5 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 1.7
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-000 512GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV70K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 147 143 139 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 824
Write 278
Mixed 182
SusWrite 154
78% 360 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 30.5
110% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 426
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 253
193% 270 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 203%
SDHC Card 32GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 23.3
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 19
32% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.7
111% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 56.4
MC Mixed 39.6
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 13.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930QDB Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 930QDB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback