Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 59.9 2-Core 105 49% 78.5 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 152 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610M 4,874 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1652) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 0.8 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 344 352 353 356 353 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 435 Write 353 Mixed 307 SusWrite 351 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 24.1 86% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 355 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 264 211% 296 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8 Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 6GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.1 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 12.1 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	218x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	150x
GeForce 610MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,874 samples	121x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	73x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	45x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	20x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16