Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 21:00
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 261
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 813
77% 639 Pts
64-Core 1,070
66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 152
Parallax 151
124% 152 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
117% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 2296 2222 1318 917 926 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,601
Write 2,353
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 1,652
462% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 67
228% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 694
DQ Mixed 834
624% 836 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 313%
Great: 370%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
145GB free
Firmware: UG4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 188 202 173 178 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 451
Write 399
Mixed 183
SusWrite 208
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 16.9
80% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 35.9
47% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
254GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 97 98 98 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 82.3
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 96.3
68% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 174 171 169 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 166
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 90%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
51GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 22.2
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 19.9
31% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
128% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 39%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 130GB
106GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 14 14 15 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Read 31.8
Write 18.6
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 14.4
23% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 29.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 28.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $416
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback