HP ProBook 655 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 655 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1992
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 09:14
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 70.7
35% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 112
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
HP(103C 1992) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 3.9
3% 5.03 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 6.4
4% 5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 90 54 56 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 400
Write 318
Mixed 183
SusWrite 90.8
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 8.5
38% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 111
96% 145 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E635 500GB
444GB free
Firmware: GH2OA8Z0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 105
Write 84.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 117
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170MN68F9F1600 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 14
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 655 G1 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 655 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback